The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child clearly expresses that minors have rights to freedom of expression and access to information online, as well as the right to privacy.

These rights would be steamrolled by age verification requirements.

  • General_Effort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Having to proof adultness cannot be done without creating a link between the identify of the adult and the account at the service.

    It can be done.

    Do you really have no other complaints?

      • General_Effort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago
        • You connect to an age-gated site.

        • Your browser receives an age verification request that does not contain information about the site.

        It would contain the time, a random number, and the query: Is user over 18/16/14/whatever?

        • Your browser sends the request to a government-licensed service.

        You identify yourself to that service in some way. The service could also be a program on your own device that uses a chip on your ID-card. If the service confirms the age, it digitally signs the request.

        • Your browser returns the signed request to the age-gated site.

        The site checks if the signature is valid and done. There’s never any connection between the age verification service and the site. If the request is more than a few seconds old, then it will be rejected to prevent sharing.

        Of course, this assumes that sites will cooperate and implement such schemes at their own expense. Obviously(?) that will only be done by the larger sites, so it will be quite pointless. I don’t know why that is not a consideration. Understanding that doesn’t actually require any deep technical knowledge. But that’s typical for EU tech regulation.

        • seeigel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          How do you prevent people from selling access to children by calling the age verification service for them?

          Btw,

          Do you really have no other complaints?

          Which other complaints could I have?

          • General_Effort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            How do you prevent people from selling access to children by calling the age verification service for them?

            The high volume of requests would be detected pretty quickly. The verification service would not know what sites you visit, but it would know that you are making requests.

            To succeed, that would need a fairly large number of stolen or fake identities. There’s really no point when you can just sell adult products, including pirated media, directly.

            • seeigel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              I don’t fully get the part about selling adult products directly.

              The verification service doesn’t need stolen accounts.

              There is a maximum number of unsuspiciously requestable tokens and people can sell their unrequested ones. There will be a black market and no ability to investigate unless privacy is lifted.

              It’s still inhibiting children, but so does telling them not to do it.

              Since foreign services do not need to comply, porn will still be available. So a firewall is needed. But then, why not give children an age appropriate vpn for their devices and accounts and leave the internet to itself?