• ogeist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Oh man, don’t read the comments, sad to see the smartasses saying “report back when you install windows again in two months” while getting utterly fucked by Windows.

    I mean, I understand being resistant to change but being a fanatic of Windows or anything for that matter just because that’s all you know is really ignorant, it’s not a sports team for fucks sake, of course it’s not easy switching and you will have problems just dont be afraid to ask and read the error warning.

    Rant over

    I use Windows for work and I miss Win10, I don’t like it but I’m aware that’s currently the target of most Consumer SW for good reason but that reason is starting to break (say it with me! BAD BUSINESS DECISIONS!!!).

    Happy to see Linux getting mainstream, not all comments are bad but I the trolls got me.

  • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Me after using the KDE: how the fuck Linux is better Windows than Windows?

    They were supposed to focus on window managing, ITS IN THEIR FUCKING NAME. Instead you need extra things like Powertoys for basic functions that KDE has integrated.

    • LucidNightmare@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      KDE is the best desktop environment I’ve ever had the pleasure of using. So much better than Windows at everything I want out of my desktop!

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            I’ve often compared Gnome, KDE and Cinnamon, and it usually boils down to KDE is often too complicated and busy, Gnome is often too simple and braindead, Cinnamon sits somewhere in the middle.

            Gnome’s settings menu is missing a lot of things you’d think should be there. They don’t want you changing things, so you end up installing separate packages like gnome-tweaks to actually render the OS usable. They’ve got this weird attitude that they’re going to out-Apple Apple with a millionth of Apple’s budget, and where Apple offers “Just Works”, Gnome offers “Barely Does Anything.”

            KDE has the opposite problem, they’ve got a setting for literally everything, if you can find it in their overgrown single settings menu. A basic applet will have several tabs crammed full of options and UI elements, making it probably the best tool for whatever mundane task it was meant for but you have to stop and figure out how it works, and it’s all rendered in janky misaligned QT so it looks like an amateur reskinned Windows 98.

            Cinnamon inherits a lot from Gnome, but puts back in the shit Gnome gouged out. I tend to find things where I think to look for them, it tends to provide the functionality I need out of the box without excessive clutter. But, it’s a bit behind the times with stuff like Wayland, so it’s not the best choice for very modern hardware.

  • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    In general:

    W11: fire up office, oops wait, it wants to set itself as default and for some reason needs you to buy a one drive subscription for that. How about some copilot? Are you sure? How about we wrap it in edge? Oh, but you can install Libreoffice by all means, but it’s not going to be the default app right? RIGHT?!!!

    Oh you want to save the file to your harddrive? Look, how do I put this,… there is no more harddrive.

    Linux: type one line in the terminal and there you go. Write a novel if you want.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Unfortunately, it goes more like this…

      Linux: type one line in the terminal? Lose 98% of the potential userbase.

      The masses hate the terminal, for some reason, and it scares them away.

      • titanicx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Yeah but fortunately is 98% of the masses will never have to touch the terminal at all. Unless they get curious. Hell my girl and boys have been on Linux for several years and they have no issues touching anything and doing anything like a standard operating system. Anything more advanced they just hand me the computer and I take care of. I’ve introduced other customers and people to Linux re-image laptops and desktops and servers to it and they’ve never had any issues running it without even worrying about the command line.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        If you are doing stuff in Linux that requires the terminal, you were probably making edits to the registry in Windows or pasting in wild powershell lines from online guides.

        No need for 98% of the user base to ever touch the terminal. Open whatever software store comes with your distro, click install next to whatever you want.

        The only exception to that is that sometimes, when a trusted person is supporting you through something, giving them a line to paste into a terminal might be quicker than walking them through all the clicks of a gui. Sometimes.

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          FYI to new users… Do not run any command without knowing what it does. Especially that one. Not even if they say “don’t worry, rm prevents you from deleting your hard drive’s contents now”, … like I fell for, 21 years ago. Doh!

          FYI to old users… Stop telling people to do that. It’s not funny. Getting new users to delete their root directory… not cool.

  • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Too bad Linux completely abandoned accessibility with Wayland by putting accessibility API implementations up to the distros. Which, by far, don’t. And when they do it’s fragmented as fuck.

    Making Linux an absolute no go for anyone that needs accessibility tools like Talon, which does work on X11 APIs. Since those were actually consistent.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Wayland is responsible for kneecapping linux desktop in so many ways its infuriating, especially since linux basically figured out the golden standard of UX design back in the 2000s with stuff like GNOME 2 and Compiz.

      It’s such an unnecessary burden with progress as slow as ripoff projects like star citizen.

      I hope valve picks up the slack with frog protocols or at least gets PRs merged, because it would be stupid to ship steam machine and then explain to the user that the clipboard doesn’t work yet, even though it used to work perfectly fine in X11.

      • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        Except accessibility, Wayland has been a huge upgrade over X11.

        Much better security isolation, proper HDR, full multi-monitor support, full VRR support, better application scaling, no screen tearing and reduced latency. (The clipboard also works fine)

        Without Wayland I would not be on Linux right now.

  • gergo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    “Tech journalists” installing linux in 2025 like it’s this hot new tech is not exactly the early adoptership I’d expect from them :)

    • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Every time anyone rejects Microsoft’s shitty bloatware/spyware it’s a win. I just converted a few months ago. Win11 is going to push more and more people away.

      • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        Ive been getting a taste of linux setting up a few raspberry Pis. Its been really fun and it got me looking at installing a linux distro on my PC. Probably ubuntu or ive heard good things about mint.

          • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 days ago

            I am following through. Prepped a mint boot drive and have a 1tb ssd on its way. Gonna dual boot for a bit but gonna try to move to mint as a daily driver. Because fuck windows

  • James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    🤞pleasejustpickbazzite pleasejustpickbazzite pleasejustpickbazzite🤞

    I’m going to install CachyOS, an Arch-based distro

    oh god dammit

    • wendigolibre@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      CachyOS has been flawless on my S/O’s desktop. From an easy install to plenty of documentation available, I couldn’t have asked for much more. During install, there’s an entire step dedicated to checking a box if you want to play games. (To enable non-free drivers).

      I don’t think it was a poor choice.

        • Mesophar@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          They didn’t say it required documentation, they said it had plenty of documentation should you need it.

            • Mesophar@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              29 days ago

              Damnit, you’re right!

              But for real, I think you misunderstand the point of documentation. Even if something were truly, literally flawless, having documentation would still be a net gain. It isn’t only to fix something when it goes wrong, but explains how things are working. If the only way for something to be literally flawless in your world view is for it to be so self explanatory that an idiot seeing it for the first time still understands it perfectly, nothing in computing can be flawless in that way.

              The pedantry on this point is so unhelpful as to be actively harmful to the rest of the discussion.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      I’M FED UP, GOING TO INSTALL LINUX!

      • picks a complicated distro where you really need to read the manual or do some heavy google searches to do gaming *

      I’M FED UP, THIS IS TOO HARD, I’M GOING BACK TO WINDOWS!

      • Aneb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        If you want to use arch for the first time use an already setup distro like Manjaro.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          Honestly, Day 1’ers, I’d rather they run Debian, Mint, Ubuntu, or Fedora. There are strong communities that are noob friendly. Go ahead and install Steam, get some games working, get their feet wet. 99% of the time, they don’t need more than basic stuff. Once they’re over being afraid of not being in windows, then start distro hopping to whatever they want.

          • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            I can really suggest Mint for beginners simply because it has an UI for about everything you need somewhat regularly. This means, that you can use GUIs to get familiar and aren’t forced to know your way around the terminal. Its the Ideal beginner Distros (at least from my experience)

            • squaresinger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              29 days ago

              That’s exactly it though. For most people using an OS isn’t about using the OS but about getting stuff done.

              I don’t run an OS because I love writing config files and running obscure CLI commands. I run an OS because I want a working browser, text editor, development setup and games. The OS is nothing but a means to an end.

              If I want to tinker, I got dozens of more fun projects in my life than trying to setup an OS.

              And if there’s a good GUI way to do what I need, that’s a win, not a downside.

              To put it differently: Do you want a hackable microwave that you can tweak and modify, where you can swap out the guts at any time, or do you want a microwave that heats your food? Most people are in the second camp, and PCs are just like microwaves a tool to get things done.

              Not being forced to know your way around the terminal is an absolute win. Don’t be afraid, nobody’s going to take your CLI from you. It will always still exist. But dumping on people who don’t want to tinker but want their stuff to work without having to google and read through manuals is just elitism and nothing to be proud of.

    • atmorous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Are you looking for fellow Bazzite users? (I’m one of them)

      Good to meet you brother/sister! We walk a rather lonesome road but glad I stand alongside you

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Nothing wrong with Arch as a distro base. The meme stuff is all bullshit. It is a peer of Debian and Fedora. These foundational community distros are not a good starting point for a beginner or for a painless consumerist experience but they are solid for experienced users and have the best support and documentation.

    If you are approaching Linux from the PoV of someone who wants to learn rather than someone who wants a reliable consumer computing platform the big community distros are still absolutely the right way to go IMO.

    People go on about Mint being friendly for users but under the surface it is Ubuntu which itself is pulling from Debian. People laud Bazzite despite it being Fedora based. ChromeOS is shipping Gentoo to school children. If you package Arch well and ship it to people like Valve has its an extremely pleasant consumer platform. CachyOS improves the arch installation and micro-optimises FPS but you can screw it up as easily as any other mutable Linux system so fundamentally it is not much better or worse than Mint or Ubuntu or Fedora for a consumer experience.

    SteamOS, Bazzite and ChromeOS all recognise that immutability is the key to a reliable experience for consumers - an experience that surpasses Windows. Updates are the most likely way to break a system and the hardest thing for non expert users to troubleshoot and rectify. Immutable distros with good support for new hardware have to be the S tier choice for Windows refugees. I have never tried Bazzite and likely never will (I use arch btw, with one system being a cachyos hybrid) but on paper it seems like the most sane choice barring a general release of StreamOS. A distro like Mint might be user friendly but it is bringing nothing new to the table when it comes to a reliable experience for consumers.

    The real solution for the majority of WIndows refugees is going to be pre-installs with the supplier guaranteeing all the hardware is supported like Steam Machine. That way you get rid of all the cursed Nvidia systems. I think something like PopOS is the wrong way to do it for normies as the old LTT videos demonstrated, it is still a fragile system for naive users underneath the friendly skin.

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    The only thing that sucks about switching to linux is moving my external NTFS USB drives to my new linux server.

    Linux HATES NTFS, hates usb drivers, and hates external drives that aren’t formatted to ext4. fstab doesn’t work for my WD Elements, so i just gave up and shucked the drive and put it inside.

    I can’t fit 5 3.5" hard drives in my SFF dell 3070, so i’m stuck on windows right now, but they keep doing random updates the last few weeks and my windows explorer freezes constantly and my computer barely works. So i’m going to have to switch to linux and possibly reformat all 36TB’s to ext4. Not excited about that at all.

    So either reformat all my external drives, buy a very expensive NAS with an external SATA port and hope my motherboard recognizes them.