It’s a joke, my friend.

The idea being that these amazing, efficient taxis yield more accidents, more cheaply than a human.

But at a FRACTION of the cost!

Agreed. And that’ll be the time I’m up in arms.

So they don’t waste my bandwidth on badly compressed, huge source video that I can’t see the difference on anyway?

Sounds like win/win to me.

This comes up a lot, and I don’t necessarily get it. I have all smart TVs, and I just never, ever, EVER let them connect to wifi even ONCE for any reason. It’s not like it NEEDS it for anything.

So, par for the course for Bethesda then?

Oh, I’m sorry… I might be too quiet.

Nice troll bait.

No, I know EXACTLY what I’m talking about. Google’s old results were based on click-through determining which results were best. Now that the quality of the average user is lower, so is the quality of the average click-through result.

That’s as much response as you’re going to get though. You responded in bad faith, so now you’re going to talk to yourself if you choose to respond.

There is more to it than that… 20 years ago most of the people on the internet were likely similar to you, so most of their desired results were similar to yours.

Now people on the internet since the early 2000 are a minority compared to the “democratized” flood of users who joined in the mobile crapplication phase and started skewing search results towards simpler, less useful results.

SEO and ads didn’t help, but the whole ecosystem broke the model.