“what do you mean we can’t use fake misleading videos to fuck democracy?”

so putting batteries in the fridge wasn’t useful after all, we should put them in the oven

is this what cancer looks like on society scale? a right wing organization destroying any attempt at equity so that billionaires can suck up even more of the world’s resources until the point of no return

make him eat all of that chicken

gives him anxiety, the same shit he causes on millions world wide by funding extreme right wing movements

I spent a couple of minutes on that website, but I still don’t understand what it wanted me to do

“We will have AI agents that run the network with no manual intervention.”

Sounds hard to believe.

billionaires are a systematic risk to the tech industry.

FFY

Oh shit had already forgotten about this amid so many other scandals. The guy who said this is running the whole of US like a fucking medieval kingdom, another reality slap in the face. At that time I was like, “surely no one right in the mind would vote for this scammer”.

I unfortunately don’t can someone explain?

I think one needs to include parameters like how soon after the topic was created the comment was made and how deep is it in the comment tree. If you for instance consistently comment on 1 month old topics or reply on comments ten levels deep you will get very few interactions.

NOOOOOO ITS DOING NUCLEAR PHYSICS!!!111

good point I try to initialize None collections to empty collections in the beginning but not always guaranteed and len would catch it

this screenshot looks more like the beginning of something else. I wonder where they trained their AI model on hmm…

no conflict of interest, none at all

It is not “assume” as in a conscious “this is probably a bool I will assume so” but more like a slip of attention by someone who is more used to the bool context of not. Is “not integer” or “not list” really that commonly used that it is even comparable to its usage in bool context?

If there is an alternative through which I can achieve the same intended effect and is a bit more safer (because it will verify that it has len implemented) I would prefer that to commenting. Also if I have to comment every len use of not that sounds quite redundant as len checks are very common

I feel like that only serves the purpose up to the point that methods are not over reaching otherwise then it turns into remembering what a method does for a bunch of unrelated objects.

no shit, dont want to have some border police going through my phone and putting me on detention only to deport me back later

I don’t know, it throws me off but perhaps because I always use len in this context. Is there any generally applicable practical reason why one would prefer “not” over len? Is it just compactness and being pythonic?