employ people that aren’t as bothered by it and pay them well. Presumably pedophiles would be more willing to moderate CSAM and people with psychopathy more willing to moderate torture and abuse. and as long as there is no paper trail of intentionally hiring these people I don’t know that it would be illegal.
more useful than most of what’s taught
I hate that at normal zoom it gives 3 and at 4 it gets slightly too small to read quickly.
I was thinking one of those bio powered military robots
the robot doesn’t need sleep, won’t get sick, and could (assuming they actually want to be competitive with human labor) require fewer safety precautions on the site (just make the entire area where the robots are as being hazardous and ensure that things won’t fall out of it) allowing for a roof to be constructed before the walls then building the walls underneath it.
the problem I have is that the law (609.772) appears to not only apply to political content, but all content that is
"so realistic that a reasonable person would believe it depicts speech or conduct of an individual who did not in fact engage in such speech or conduct; " and made without consent and wintin 90 days of political party conventions or after absentee voting starts.
By the way it is written the “presidents play Minecraft” series which most informed people would fully understand was not made my any presidents would likely fall under this law.
because one side is prioritizing democratic principles and the other is making an argument that could be related to the first amendment. Twitter absolutely isn’t doing this for any good reason, but the argument could be used for one.
is that actually usable (including app installs) for years without ever contacting a phone after initial setup?
asbestos at least was the best option until a couple years ago for numerous applications.
how many smartwatches existed that can be used without a phone?
because humans with resources (money) should be allowed to use it how they please, be it on tungsten cubes or pointless devices
because humans with resources (money) should be allowed to use it how they please, be it on tungsten cubes or pointless devices
that still uniquely identifies you to the company and would make having multiple accounts that are fully separate harder. in addition there would be no way of knowing whether or not the government has or hasn’t hidden another layer of data (like your name) in the certificate.
This would also be trivial for children to bypass as it would need to be usable an unlimited number of times (or else individuals couldn’t have multiple accounts) therefore it would only take one adult sharing their cert and signature publicly for any child to have a valid certificate.
and this is why humans are bad, a tool is neither good or bad, sure a tool can use a large amount of resources to develop only to be completely obsolete in a year but only humans (so far) have the ability (and stupidity) to be both in charge of millions of lives and trust a bunch of lithographed rocks to create tarrif rates for uninhabited islands (and the rest of the world).
it would almost certainly need to be done at a fast charger, not at home unless it could do only a few cells at a time. Remember the golden rule: “Don’t set the house on fire by overloading the wiring”.
the fact that they received a validation request is informative that they probably shouldn’t be able to access, however regardless of implementation, assuming causality and the speed of light remain, this will be information the government will recieve. Some entity (probably the government) would* also need to know who to send the response to, technically they could just broadcast this over some low frequency transmission broadcast to everyone, but realistically the government would need some kind of address (IP, fax number, po box, etc.).
Technically this is an implementation detail, however the only ways to implement this type of thing that wouldn’t be comprimizing would involve citizen prompted government broadcasts and trust that the government won’t have records of who requested the broadcast and what number was sent (which would make it trivial for adults to just sell the age identifier) and would still worsen the average citizen’s security because it still takes effort to generate a unique identifier for every site.
yes, however the government should NEVER have access to what social messaging apps ANYONE uses without a warrant.
no, the GameCube intro is iconic and the government overreach is chronic
specialization of labor is still a good thing, it’s just that having enough knowledge to fix basic around the house problems (like a sink) is helpful and, at least where I’ve lived, it takes less time to learn how to fix a sink than to find a plumber. For larger or more complicated problems, like a toilet or shower, professionals are almost always the better choice.
at least the west is starting to acknowledge the torturous monotony of doing the same job for decades.