Politics isn’t rational.

And that’s nothing. You know how they’re pushing for washing machines, dishwashers, etc. to be internet connected? Currently they’re forcing this for data mining purposes. But I have no doubt their real goal is to eventually make these devices like printers, with expensive consumables locked in by internet-connected DRM. They’ve already gotten people used to using dish and clothes detergent pods. How long until they’re putting everything in plastic cartridges, locking things down with DRM, and charging like printer companies do?

Yeah, I don’t think the EU would be able to provide serious military assistance if there was ever a war between Canada and the US. But that’s no different from Canada’s position in the British Commonwealth. Canada would join with the implicit understanding that the EU security guarantees would be largely symbolic. Canada joining the EU would all be about the common customs union, the free movement of people, etc. In this context, geography is less important than having countries with similar political systems and development levels. It’s hard to see really poor countries being admitted to the EU, as that would cause a flood of immigration. And of course there are standards in regards to democratic systems, civil rights, etc. But Canada should have no problem meeting those requirements. And Canada would fit well within the range of EU countries in terms of GDP per capita. There wouldn’t be some vast exodus of Canadians moving to the mainland Europe if Canada was admitted to the EU.

Eh. Canada is already part of the British Commonwealth. In theory, in the event of any invasions, the British crown is supposed to come to Canada’s aid. But realistically, in a war with the US, there wouldn’t be much the UK government could really do about it unless it wanted to start throwing nukes around. 1812 was a long time ago. The Royal Navy is not going to sink the US Navy and force supply lines open. Britain isn’t torching the White House the second time around. The red coats aren’t coming to save Canadian independence. Today, the US’s military capabilities absolutely dwarf those of the UK. In Canada’s case, the Commonwealth’s security guarantees are largely symbolic, at least in the scenario of a US invasion.

Canada in the EU would be a similar model. It would mostly just be about the customs union, free trade, free movement of people, etc. Sure, nominally, the EU would be required to defend Canada in the event of an attack against its territory. But in practice there really wouldn’t be much the EU could do.

But that’s no reason not to do it. I see no reason Canada couldn’t join the EU. There would be immense immediate benefits in terms of economy, culture, trade, and all the other peacetime benefits of EU integration. Yes, the defense guarantees the EU provides would be largely symbolic in Canada’s case. But it’s not like joining the EU would make Canada less safe.

I mean, the EU already has territory near the North American continent. and in South America.

Yup. I’m pretty sour on Bethesda RPGs after getting burned hard by Starfield. But I have a hard time imagining even they could fuck up a simple remastering of a game I already loved in the past.

An entire town of dead people. It was hilarious.

I see you also follow the life philosophy of, “if you’re not on at least one watch list, are you even really living?” :D

I still remember my first playthrough. Low level character. I save scummed until I could sneak into the tower in the heart of the Imperial City. In the council chamber was a mage with an incredibly powerful staff. I pickpocketed it off of him, again using save scumming. I then traveled to Bravil and entered the castle there. As the Count of Bravil was giving a speech, I pulled out the staff and zapped him dead on his throne, right in front the of the whole court. I then got away from the assassination through the brilliant escape plan of running out the front door, murder weapon still in hand.

Damn I loved Oblivion.

Muuuuurrddeeerrr!!!

IDK how to feel about rising video game prices. On the one hand, prices were stagnant for decades. On the other hand, companies can sell far more copies of games than they could back in the 1980s and 1990s. The cost of games is all in the development. The more you sell, the cheaper the price can be. They cost next to nothing to package and distribute (or are distributed digitally.)

On one hand, games are a lot more complex and expansive than they were back in the day. On the other, game devs now have tools the creators of old couldn’t even dream of. No one is hand coding the next Mario game is assembly.

There’s a lot of variables here. And it’s really just hard to make a fair judgment about it.

Don’t copy that floppy!

I assume it’s because it’s run entirely off of a single old zip disk drive manufactured in 1998.

I need to build something like that, just for this purpose. Out of wood of course. Need to find some plans somewhere…

No reason to assume this happened on a work night.