• 0 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2024

help-circle


  • Note that the lawyer specifically talks about an occupation of the HU in May, not the famously violent one of the FU in October that is discussed in the rest of the article.

    Also, the article states that it is currently still investigated by the public prosecutor, outcome unknown.

    Therefore, I find it difficult to claim that none of these persons is ‘investigated for violent crime in relation to the FU occupation’, Even if they should decide against ‘Landfriedensbruch’ specifically, something we don’t know, who’s to say it won’t be something else instead?

    E: formatting


  • Also the state attorneys are not prosecuting the people in question for violent crimes at the event in question.

    So none of the people are investigated for violent crime in relation to the FU-occupation.

    Are you sure? (German) source::

    Ob das Geschehen im Innern den Tatbestand des Landfriedensbruchs erfüllt, ist ebenfalls nicht gesichert. Die Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin teilte auf LTO-Anfrage jedoch mit, auch bei ihnen sei dieses Delikt vermerkt. Ein Ende der Ermittlungen sei aber noch nicht absehbar.

    Translation

    It is also not certain whether what happened inside the building constitutes a breach of the public peace [Landfriedensbruch]. However, the Berlin public prosecutor’s office informed LTO that this offense had also been recorded. However, an end to the investigation is not yet in sight. [deepl]

    E: formatting