- 3 Posts
- 29 Comments
Why the classification of “borders on state terrorism” rather than actually being classified as such?
While breaking the agreement? If they’re breaking the agreement, what difference does it make where it comes from?
Mislabeling would be a problem no matter what they trade. And ultimately sabotage any trade deals.
Having trade deals on both sides doesn’t man you can ship whatever from one to the other.
They can trade over set of things with one, and another set with the other.
If my gov creates a digital cert of age and signs it then I should be able to use that and the service provider can verify against gov public key, no? No information of visit exchanged.
As an alternative I also expect it to be possible via zero knowledge proof https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-knowledge_proof
Isn’t that a matter of implementation whether they even receive this information or not during validation?
Lol that drop icon
Reads “A drop” or “B dropped”
And is so expressive I can hear the crack - even though it’s a shock resistance rather than crack-ability.
What do you mean by violating privacy?
If you have a passport, citizenship, or birth certificate your age is already documented.
I’ve seen some negative reporting on afd Landesregierung, where we can see them act in power. Unfortunately I can’t point to any right now.
It is very silly right now to admit you wanted to work on a tourist visa.
Where did they admit that?
About having no bookings yet, that part was always sketchy. I went 15 years ago to the US for a 4 week trip and had only lined up the first hostel for a few days, the rest I had not planned yet, luckily got no questions but worried about it back then already… Guess this is a thing of the past now.
Huh? You base “was always sketchy” on your personal feelings doing that yourself 15 years ago?
I really don’t see what’s sketchy about not booking four weeks ahead.
I’m more of a planner, but my grandparents get in their car and drive through and around Italy without a single stay pre-planned.
I don’t see how that’s suspicious or sketchy at all.
1·11 days agoFree 14-day trial with a limited number of improvements.
25 € / month.
Languages: English (US and UK).
InstaText uses advanced language technologies, but not generative AI, to suggest recommendations and ideas for improving text clarity and readability.
With regard to differences to Grammarly and the like:
The main function of Grammarly and similar tools is proofreading. They mainly check your text for spelling and grammar and do not offer suggestions for in-depth editing. Therefore, InstaText is the ideal choice for those who want to improve the clarity, style, and readability of their texts with more detailed suggestions.
All data is transmitted to their servers. As per policy, not used for anything other than offering the suggestions. They strongly recommend not to submit any personal data though:
Please note that we strongly advise you not to use our text improvement service for texts that contain personal data of any kind.
The website uses Google Analytics.
Tracking integration of Google, Meta - presumably on their website only.
Data transfer to Canada (I checked to make sure they don’t transfer to the US despite being based in Canada).
The comment linked to Druide; here is the Antidote website.
- English OR French 60 € / year / user.
- English AND French 90 € / year / user.
- English OR French 100 € / year / 5 user.
- English AND French 150 € / year / 5 user.
It isn’t.
You don’t want Trump to throw a tantrum when you go there to negotiate something mostly unrelated, so you delay the announcement.
I absolutely agree with that. The algorithms are one of the significant promoters of destabilization, propaganda, disorientation, and manipulation, by platforms and by other parties making use of them.
It is essential for the EU to regulate them. Through transparency and requirements, and adequate consequences.
It was one of my points in the EU survey response and content about it here on Lemmy https://feddit.org/post/10253134/5842417
That seems wasteful
There’s alternatives, and taxes don’t prevent use in the first place.
Public data or Facebook data?
If 75 percent block together, 25 percent can be blocked. The rest is limited. If you legitimate them through participation, you risk them being seen more acceptable a reasonable option.
This is the first time you notice because it’s the first good idea halo they ever had. /s
Remember the physical switch on floppy disks that enable or disable writing?
Good times.