Synology’s telegraphed moves toward a contained ecosystem and seemingly vertical integration are certain to rankle some of its biggest fans, who likely enjoy doing their own system building, shopping, and assembly for the perfect amount of storage. “Pro-sumers,” homelab enthusiasts, and those with just a lot of stuff to store at home, or in a small business, previously had a good reason to buy one Synology device every so many years, then stick into them whatever drives they happened to have or acquired at their desired prices. Synology’s stated needs for efficient support of drive arrays may be more defensible at the enterprise level, but as it gets closer to the home level, it suggests a different kind of optimization.

  • filcuk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Not everyone has time, skill, or desire to spend their nights learning how to build and configure a nas.
    People have other hobbies than IT, so if a photographer wants to have a local storage for his portfolio without faff, I guess they can get fucked?
    Really with your gatekeeping

    • ftbd@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Don’t get me wrong, I don’t support this. But I can see how the suits at Synology could come to the conclusion that this is a great idea