w3dd1e

I don’t have all the details to the case, but after reading the article I kinda think they got it wrong.

Let that man call himself Lambo and keep the domain. As long as he isn’t pretending to represent another brand, such as Lamborghini.

I tried to play it on GamePass and got bored immediately.

Good. I want them to know. I want everyone to know that ICE is a bunch of limp dick nazis.

Yeah! I saw reporting on this months ago.

What I appreciated about this article was the detail about how they tried to hide it.

Also I love GN. Thanks for sharing!

It’s the confusion between and LLM and AI.

LLMs are just algorithms that understand language. They don’t really think for themselves. They just search the database of stolen ideas and try to apply it.

But we all use those words interchangeably they basically mean the same thing.

I love Ed. He is the personification of my emotions.

Don’t say AI found it, just an algorithm caught it.

Could have been as simple as a spreadsheet highlighting cells with a ratio that was below a threshold.

Article didn’t say what software was used.

Edit: I meant “didn’t say”. Autocorrect has been really going after me lately.

The article said it was an algorithm that detected it, not AI.

Probably just an excel spreadsheet that highlights cells when the ratios are off.

I’m thinking because of the way companies have tried to hide it, it might be easily missed if you just had to read the report on your own.

Do they need Kushner for that? They done a pretty good job funneling money to Him over the last 8 years.

And the rest is Jared Kushner. Enjoy that shit sandwich.

EA was already shit, but somehow they found bread made from shit and built a whole sandwich.

This headline is a bit misleading. The article also says that only 2/3 of the errors GPT found were verified errors (according to the author).

• Overall, ChatGPT identified 56 supposed errors in these 31 featured articles.

• I confirmed 38 of these (i.e. 68%) as valid errors in my assessment. Implemented corrections for 35 of these, and Agreed with 3 additional ones without yet implementing a correction myself. Disagreed with 13 of the alleged errors (23%).

• I rated 4 as** Inconclusive** (7%), and one as  Not Applicable (in the sense that ChatGPT’s observation appeared factually correct but would only have implied an error in case that part of the article was intended in a particular way, a possibility that the ChatGPT response had acknowledged explicitly).

What do you define as cheating? Like I might look up a guide online, sometimes, but I never use mods or exploit bugs.

You made out like a bandit!

Buying used RAM on marketplace and hoping it isn’t broken. Hoping it was just stolen from a Best Buy. Fingers crossed y’all!

Fuck that noise. ChatGPT and OpenAI murdered Adam Raine and should be held responsible for it.

What if it’s not a publicly traded company like OpenAI?

Using a browser like Librewolf is, itself a unique identifier bc not enough people are using it.

EFF has a tool that lets you check your “uniqueness” and bc I used a lesser known browser, it was easier to track me.

Not that I mean you shouldn’t use it. I just wanted to clarify that it doesn’t make you safe from ads. :(

I get that we should expect shit like this from Amazon but at the same time, they bought something and the maker completely changed how the device worked after they bought it.

I’d be pissed too. We have to hold these companies accountable.